

| Subject: | Re: Vanagons as electric vehicles and other stuff.... |
| From: | Michael A. Radtke |
| Date: | Tue, 6 May 2008 08:29:27 -0700 |
Allan, Thanks for your comments. The EV1, the Toyota RAV4, the Ford Th!nk and the others were fully qualified to US safety standards. These were all either production or pilot production cars, not pre-production cars. The size and weight of the Vanagon don't necessarily make it a worse candidate for conversion. There have been many full size van EV conversions and also full size production electric vans. The issue is that you need a certain percentage of the vehicle's weight in batteries. A bigger vehicle, more batteries. The performance remains the same when compared to a small vehicle. The big difference is cost. Google "electric vanagon" and you will find more information. Thanks, Mike -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Vanagons as electric vehicles and other stuff.... Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 23:41:10 -0400 From: Allan Streib <streib@cs.indiana.edu> To: Michael A. Radtke <wa7zpu@CISAZ.COM> CC: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM References: <380-22008504235752196@earthlink.net> <039701c8ae59$1e3c4d90$0401a8c0@cspfr2> <481E81AB.4020604@cisaz.com> "Michael A. Radtke" <wa7zpu@CISAZ.COM> writes: > The EV1, the Toyota RAV4 and the other cars that rose to the > California challenge did quite well even on lead acid batteries. > However, the car companies chose to fight California's mandates in > court and won. Just as soon as they were victorious, they recalled > their cars and crushed them. I don't recall the sources, but the way I remember this those vehicles were "experimental" and did not have to meet DOT safety standards. They were crushed because they were not safe. > There have been some Vanagon conversions but I can't speak to how > successful they were. With current technology, the Vanagon is too heavy a chassis for a pure electric. Might do OK as a hybrid. Allan -- 1991 Vanagon GL
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »