

| Subject: | Re: Increasing fuel economy/decreasing con$umption |
| From: | Neil2 |
| Date: | Sun, 25 May 2008 12:58:50 -0700 |
Let 'em become hostile. Everyone has to grow and by molly-coddling them you're inhibiting their maturity. Besides, when's the last time you saw a farmer and his rig react to your hostility when he's in betwixt his fields!? Oh, and keep a cell phone and firearm handy for those truckers who might go 'sideways'. On 5/24/08, Trooz <trooz@roadrunner.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] > > On Behalf Of Jarrett Anthony Kupcinski > > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:14 AM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Re: Increasing fuel economy/decreasing con$umption > > > > Bravo! > > > > I've always thought that the "sweet spot" in a vanagon is around 55 > > mph. The handling, fuel consumption, road and wind noise, and just > > over all quality of the driving experience are much better at the > > lower speed in a vanagon, IMHO. > > > > -Jarrett > > That's consistent with my driving experience. I've always wondered what > the > mileage would be like if one dropped the speed even lower as Jeff > mentioned. > I would guess that it would improve, as he said. > > The problem I have is that when driving 55 around southern California > you're > pissing people off, and when I travel I-40 back and forth to New Mexico I > usually keep it at a minimum of 60, otherwise I've found that truckers can > become very hostile. > > Bob > -- Neil '82 Diesel Westy Peace of
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »