

| Subject: | Re: hmm |
| From: | neil N |
| Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 09:57:36 -0700 |
For sure. I agree. $120 and costs to replace the element at various intervals (depending on year of vehicle) is nothing. It make sense to me. Especially if what is "caught" from the exhaust is truly recycled. If it comes to market, I'd install one on my Westy in a heartbeat. But would this "muffler" give me that classic Vanagon sound? --- ;^) Neil. On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@gmail.com> wrote: > dear all > > the reason i have posted this is to speak to some of those failing tests in > theor area > if the claim is true then 120$ is nothing to spend on a clean test > the idea looks sound .. > like 0 emission stacks in an industrial chimney > recirculating the waste trough a filter ... looks like a natural next step > to me > wish i had of thought of it oh well ... > yours > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:19 AM, neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Very interesting. >> >> And it looks like this technology can be retrofitted. i.e. To a Vanagon! >> >> I googled " AEPR" and found Adcapital Industries. >> >> From Adcapital Industries. Demo video: >> >> http://adcapitalindustries.com/products.html >> >> But check out estimated consumer costs (bottom of page): >> >> http://adcapitalindustries.com/products-works.html >> >> It all seems a little too good to be true, but it doesn't look like bs to >> me. >> >> Interesting. >> >> Neil.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »