

| Subject: | Re: Engine cover, History |
| From: | Neil2 |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Jul 2008 22:53:31 -0700 |
Funny, I thought the rubberized top, fiber innards and metal would be much better for sound absorbtion/deadening than the foam and plastic. Answer me other emails (3 now and counting) and we can discuss fair deals. On 7/2/08, Scott <scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > > > The main advantage to the metal ones are some ( literally ) 'fire wall' > affect if there's an engine fire. > The nice thing about the plastic ones are how much lighter they are. > I don't think there's a big difference in sound deadening. > Be glad to give you a fair deal on a plastic engine cover. > Scott > www.turbovans.com > > > On Thu Jul 3 2:33 , John Rodgers sent: > > But you can't toast marshmellows like with the plastic ones once a hole > melts through. > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver > > > Chris S wrote: > > Metal allows you to cook hot dogs while the engine is on fire. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Neil2 <vidublu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey volks, > >> > >> My diesel Westy (81.5) has a metal cover and all others I've seen are > >> plastic. What's the story? > >> > >> For those who prefer a more direct approach: > >> > >> Is the metal version better, sound dampening, for instance? > >> > >> Does the plastic version have advantages? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Neil2 > >> '82 Diesel Westy (Duckie) > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- Neil2 '82 Diesel Westy (Duckie)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »