Kim gives a little sobriety to all ya'll.

Yes, I've not seen me brother's results but I've no reason to think he
cannot calculate fuel mileage if he can design multimillion dollar water
fountains.  He's got a LOT more math than moi and I don't seem to have
trouble with fuel mileage calcs.  His response to me is a steady, 'Read the
books' learn it.  Stop debunking before you try it or until you try it.
David, who I met two weeks ago runs his own electrical business and after
spending hours with him and seeing his demonstration I've no doubt he has
his head on straight.  Neither of these two blokes is trying to make a
buck.  The only person I've spoken to personally who debunked HHO answered
in the negative when I inquired if he really did his homework.  HIs results
were lousy, I suspect, because he was a backyard billy playing with
something He knew not.

I find it insulting that those who debunk HHO don't refer to any of me bro's
statements in the cut/paste I sent.  A cursory statement about negative sum
games is insufficient to outweight the arguments of two users I know
personally.

For the record: If anyone wishes to take the time to correspond with someone
who HAS tested HHO and IS reaping benefits both in fuel mileage and better
operation I'll be glad to forward your pmail to either David or my brother,
upon request.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Mike S <mikes@flatsurface.com> wrote:

> At 11:01 PM 7/14/2008, Kim Springer wrote...
>
>> I've never read such a jumbled up mess of mixed misunderstanding.
>>
>> If you are going to comment, then at least read up on the product and
>> watch some videos of it Mike. You're making a fool of yourself.
>>
>
> Time will prove who's correct. Better to be thought a fool than to
> actually be an idiot.
>
> http://www.cracked.com/article_16484_p2.html
>

--
Neil2
'86 Vanagon/Weekender in process (Savannah)
Nunquam Pendite Divendium