

| Subject: | Re: Are Today's Young People Mechanical Nitwits? |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:57:01 -0700 |
I know its Frday and all, but keep the f*cking politics OFF THE LIST! On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Oliver Mueller-Heubach < groundhogging@mac.com> wrote: > Sorry.. too many articles I've had to read for school on whether > agriculture was a good or bad move for humans (cultural ecology, > paleoepidemiology, etc.). What we know as non-agricultural and non- > industrial societies today are almost entirely transformed by fallout > from world capitalism, so hard to know what it would really be like > (nowhere near the present conditions, though). Hunter-forager life > would be more sustainable and there would be more gain per unit > effort as far as food. There would be no cities, hence less disease > threat, etc. Limited food would limit reproduction and the lions, > tigers, and bears would do the rest... I didn't say it would ever > work again- we are creatures of habit and comfort hounds to boot > > On Aug 15, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Joy Hecht wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Oliver Mueller-Heubach < >> groundhogging@mac.com> wrote: >> >> Depends on what classifies as a good standard of living. Without >>> agriculture, we might be considerably better off in some ways, >>> with more >>> free time and better health within a certain age range. >>> >>> >> Huh? Without agriculture, what are you going to eat? Either >> someone else >> grows it and you buy it, or you spend all your time growing crops. >> Agriculture is a VERY risky business, takes a lot of time. I don't >> know any >> farmers, but what I've read about being one emphasizes CONSTANT >> work and you >> can't ever take a break. >> >> >> We might only live to 30, but we would be closer to the earth and >>> those >>> around us. >>> >>> >> I'll take another 60 years over that, any day! >> >> >> At least the 1/10 of a percent of the current population that could >>> sustained without surpluses, etc. I'm not sure we're any better >>> off than >>> most pre-industrial civilizations (even with states, organized >>> religions, >>> and agriculture). >>> >>> >> I work in non-industrial civilizations. Life is damned hard. A >> huge amount >> of work, and nothing to do when you aren't working except maybe >> talk to your >> neighbors or get drunk or have sex. No books, no communications, no >> electricity, no transportation. Little or nothing in the way of >> schools, medical care, sewage, clean drinking water. Sex leads to >> yet more >> children, which makes life even harder, especially when it comes to >> what >> land they will inherit to live on - land doesn't multiply the way >> children >> do. No privacy whatsoever living in a small village. Basically no >> choices. But yeah, you are close to the earth, that's for sure. >> >> I'll take specialization of labor and longer life over that any >> day! And >> for those who want to work on their own cars, why that's an option >> as well, >> in the world we live in. Choice is a good thing. If young folks >> don't >> choose to work on cars, let's cheer the fact that they can do what >> they want >> either way, instead of bemoaning that they don't choose what some >> on this >> list prefer. >> >> >> Joy >> > > Oliver Mueller-Heubach > groundhogging@mac.com > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »