

| Subject: | Re: 2.1 running again, thanks, list! |
| From: | The Westy man |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:14:10 -0700 |
There are several reason why I like my method. One is the simplicity of letting it down on the floor or lifting it to the transmission. The other is, I don't have to lift the car up only one side a little and I pull the engine out on the side not toward the back, on a drip tray that I made holes into to be able to tie ropes there to pull the engine around. It is a little heavy but not too bad. So, I don't have the struggle with the fitting to the transmission and the lifting of the car and the moving around of the engine. And it is a tiny equipment, the drip tray is used anyway and it fits behind the cabinet. Zoltan ----- Original Message ----- From: "mdrillock" <mdrillock@COX.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 5:00 PM Subject: Re: 2.1 running again, thanks, list! > For lifting the back of the van higher I make my own wooden stands out > of 16" lengths of 4x4 to put under the back tires. > > I nail 2x4 blocks on the top near each end of the 4x4. These act as > wheel chocks so the van can't roll off. Then I jack up each side in turn > with a floor jack under the lower control arm until the wooden stand can > slide in from the side under the tire and lower down onto the wood > stand. For even greater height I have some with 2x4 nailed on both > sides, using slightly longer pieces sideways on the bottom for more > stability. I often put a set under all 4 wheels and this is great, > especially for Syncro drive train work . > > When putting things like these under the wheels jacking up just the > wheel is the way to go. With a piece of wood on the floor jack for > protection you can learn to lift under the lower control arm, front or > rear, and slide the wood stand into place under the tire with a minimum > of jacking. If you jack on the body you must raise the whole van quite a > ways before the tire lifts high enough. No need to do this. > > Mark > > > Jim Felder wrote: >> I'm talking about lifting the vanagon rear end enough to lower the >> motor--with a hoist hanging from a saw horse sitting over the back >> hatch--and lowering it to the floor. Sounds like we're all doing the >> same thing, just a bit differently. I have to get my motor from the >> garage hoist to the car on a furniture dolly, so I have just figured >> out how to lift the van high enough to accommodate the motor and the >> dolly. The plywood with broomsticks is a good idea. If I had not had >> to make a trip to a store for a bag of marbles, I was going to use >> marbles. They would be omnidirectional--not that it matters once the >> engine is off the ground. >> >> I did use a block and tackle so I could fore-and-aft the engine with >> one hand while I used the hoist for up-and-down. >> >> Jim >> >> Jim >> >> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:56 PM, mdrillock <mdrillock@cox.net> wrote: >> >>> I agree, lifting from above has too many advantages to go back to floor >>> jacks. I built my first version to do it that way about 10 years ago and >>> I still use it. >>> I have 4 floor jacks and a tranny jack but for engine >>> removal/installation the hoist method is preferred. >>> >>> Another thing I use is a piece of plywood about 2' x 4'. I put 2 holes >>> near one short edge and put a rope handle into those holes. This is >>> what I lower the engine down onto. Then I pull the wood with engine out >>> from under the van with the rope handle. I put the engine back the same >>> way but I use some broom stick pieces under the plywood to help roll the >>> engine/plywood back into place. The end of the plywood with the rope >>> should be as far from the engine as practical to help with sliding the >>> wood. Lowering the engine onto any kind of cart requires the vehicle to >>> be raised higher than just a piece of plywood does. >>> >>> My device is more like a sawhorse with room below it for a come-a-long >>> type hoist. The added height is required for some Vanagon engines though >>> not waterboxers. My sawhorse is made of square steel tubing. >>> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> The Westy man wrote: >>> >>>> Amaizing how little recognition that simple device I made, to take out >>>> and >>>> istall the engine to make it a joy, received. And for me to read about >>>> double jacks and all kind of obvious struggles with platforms and what >>>> not, >>>> is really a puzzle why most don't realized the simplicity without >>>> lifting >>>> the car both sides. >>>> Well, we are not all the same, I guess. I went through my struggles >>>> myself >>>> too. >>>> Zoltan >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1612 - Release > Date: 8/14/2008 6:03 PM > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »