Jim A., et al:
Perhaps it's time, again, to do a review of the List history and
status of the List hardware.
Our basis and moment is now at least 17 years old, most being much
older.  We are not a static group.
Even though we accept new and younger members, our population ages
and our collective memory fades without review.
This discussion has come up every few years in my 9-10 year List tenure.
What seems to be consensual in this latest discussion is that we need
to think about addressing the hardware issue, NOT the format issue.
The question is not who the Manager of the list is.  (IMO he is doing
just fine.)
I believe the question is,  "Do we need to seek action or just remain
vigilant to the status quo?"

Stephen
Chillicothe OH

On Aug 26, 2008, at 8:45 PM, Jim Arnott wrote:

> With regard to the original question, I am.
>
> I'm not ignoring you all, I'm listening.  Haven't come to any
> conclusions yet, but I AM listening.
> (clip)