

| Subject: | Re: Who is the Manager of this list? |
| From: | B Feddish |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:52:41 -0400 |
Ah yes, the web based email. Search the archives for my rant that almost everyone complaining about the current list is always from someone with a free throway email account. In perspective, those with cludgy web based emails still have to load a web page to go to their mail, etc. so using a web based forum is not far off. I'm still using an EXE based email client and love the Vanagon list as an email. I hate using a browser when I don't have to. As far as I'm concerned web based email clients stink*. Bryan *Disclaimer: I am a software developer that often gets hired to replace some cludgy web based program that never really works with a real executable version. Web development still isn't there yet. Feel free to flame me personally with your "Have you tried Blahbhahba Version 99 with AJAX???, It's better than Blahahahaha". I can just delete them quickly with MS Outlook. -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of David Kao Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:31 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Who is the Manager of this list? Making change will always get resistance, including from myself. But a modern forum no doubt is far better than the old list platform. Yahoo, Gmail and probably most other mail programs are all web based. So a web based forum is not going to be any slower, if the graphic content and java scripts are kept at a minimum. Setting up a modern forum is not difficult. They are free from many web hosting sites. But cost of web hosting could grow out of control if traffic out of the forum site grows out of control. With the current list platform it is impossible to respond to posts interactively. Yahoo very often delays list emails until the next morning. It is very difficult to search the archive. There is no storage for photos. Many of the discussion are taken offline so a lot of discussions are started on the list but get offline and gone afterwards. Why resisting the change? David --- Gary Bawden <goldfieldgary@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > Hi Volks, > > Just my two cents: I like the current format. Many of us who live out > in the boonies find dealing with websites to be a PITA (slow speeds, > etc.). For example, I signed up on Karl Mullendore's Diesel site, and > while I am happy to see a more specialized forum, it's just not the > same as what we have here - - more of a community, folksy and open. I > like that. > > Gary > > > Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:45:23 -0700 > > From: Jim Arnott <jr.arnott@GMAIL.COM> > > Subject: Re: Who is the Manager of this list? > > > > With regard to the original question, I am. > > > > I'm not ignoring you all, I'm listening. Haven't come to any > > conclusions yet, but I AM listening. > > > > > 1.) trim, trim, trim. We are all aware of what's gone before. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »