

| Subject: | Re: misc (mpg, transmission, driving habits.) |
| From: | Jim Akiba |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:59:48 -0400 |
I was wondering if you'd chipped them or some such. Calling it 230 is already like the old SAE gross pre-72 I can't let you get away with 240 if you haven't earned it :) So do they have EGRs or no? Jim Akiba On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> wrote: > Eh? Isn't that the right horsepower on the SVX? Oh, 230 hp. mea culpa. > > > On Sep 12, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Jim Akiba wrote: > >> Kim do you have an active EGR system on the SVXs in your vans? Where >> does the 240HP for the SVXs come from, measured or guess? >> >> Jim Akiba >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> wrote: >>> >>> My most recent vehicle purchase is not a Vanagon. But a Jaguar X-Type >>> (small 4 wheel drive sedan). I got it as I wanted a winter vehicle >>> OTHER than my Vanagons, and I wanted something that got (relatively) >>> good fuel economy. >>> >>> So it is interesting (to me) to compare engine/transmission and fuel >>> economy between it and my "normal" Vanagons. >>> >>> Vehicle Jaguar X-type Vanagon Syncro Vanagon Syncro Camper >>> Engine 3.0 V6 3.3 H6 3.3 H6 >>> weight 3428 lbs 3650 lbs 4000 lbs >>> HP 231 240 240 >>> MPG 18-30mpg 16-17 mpg 15-17 mpg >>> L n/a 6.03 6.03 >>> 1st 3.42 3.78 3.78 >>> 2nd 2.14 2.06 2.06 >>> 3rd 1.45 1.23 1.08 >>> 4th 1.03 0.86 0.70 >>> 5th 0.77 n/a n/a >>> Final Drive 3.80 5.43 5.43 >>> Tire size 225/45R17 225/70R15 215/75R16 >>> >>> MPG figure is real world experience GPS corrected for tire size >>> differences. >>> >>> Tire size on the vanagon doesn't seem to make any difference towards >>> fuel economy (from using 205/65R15 tires or 215/75R16) >>> >>> On the Jag, the gearing is oriented towards sporty. If I don't shift >>> extremely early the mpg figure drops dramatically. Early shifting is >>> around 2800 rpm (at most). On the Vanagons, I find that if I shift at >>> less than 4000 rpms, the engine tends to accelerate VERY slowly (On >>> the Westy, the big jump between 2nd and 3rd really means I wind up 2nd >>> pretty decently.) >>> >>> In reviewing all the specs, it occurs to me that while the >>> aerodynamics make some difference as to the fuel economy, especially >>> above 50 mph, it is possible that the final drive ratio is the big >>> difference. >>> >>> I'll have to do a lot more experimenting with driving habits in my >>> passenger syncro to see if I can't make a significant impact on my >>> fuel economy. >>> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »