

| Subject: | Re: misc (mpg, transmission, driving habits.) |
| From: | Kim Brennan |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:45:02 -0400 |
No EGR, but yes, I've chipped both of my SVX engines in my Vanagons. On Sep 13, 2008, at 3:59 AM, Jim Akiba wrote: > I was wondering if you'd chipped them or some such. Calling it 230 is > already like the old SAE gross pre-72 I can't let you get away with > 240 if you haven't earned it :) So do they have EGRs or no? > > Jim Akiba > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> > wrote: >> Eh? Isn't that the right horsepower on the SVX? Oh, 230 hp. mea >> culpa. >> >> >> On Sep 12, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Jim Akiba wrote: >> >>> Kim do you have an active EGR system on the SVXs in your vans? Where >>> does the 240HP for the SVXs come from, measured or guess? >>> >>> Jim Akiba >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@mac.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> My most recent vehicle purchase is not a Vanagon. But a Jaguar X- >>>> Type >>>> (small 4 wheel drive sedan). I got it as I wanted a winter vehicle >>>> OTHER than my Vanagons, and I wanted something that got >>>> (relatively) >>>> good fuel economy. >>>> >>>> So it is interesting (to me) to compare engine/transmission and >>>> fuel >>>> economy between it and my "normal" Vanagons. >>>> >>>> Vehicle Jaguar X-type Vanagon Syncro Vanagon Syncro Camper >>>> Engine 3.0 V6 3.3 H6 3.3 H6 >>>> weight 3428 lbs 3650 lbs 4000 lbs >>>> HP 231 240 240 >>>> MPG 18-30mpg 16-17 mpg 15-17 mpg >>>> L n/a 6.03 6.03 >>>> 1st 3.42 3.78 3.78 >>>> 2nd 2.14 2.06 2.06 >>>> 3rd 1.45 1.23 1.08 >>>> 4th 1.03 0.86 0.70 >>>> 5th 0.77 n/a n/a >>>> Final Drive 3.80 5.43 5.43 >>>> Tire size 225/45R17 225/70R15 215/75R16 >>>> >>>> MPG figure is real world experience GPS corrected for tire size >>>> differences. >>>> >>>> Tire size on the vanagon doesn't seem to make any difference >>>> towards >>>> fuel economy (from using 205/65R15 tires or 215/75R16) >>>> >>>> On the Jag, the gearing is oriented towards sporty. If I don't >>>> shift >>>> extremely early the mpg figure drops dramatically. Early shifting >>>> is >>>> around 2800 rpm (at most). On the Vanagons, I find that if I >>>> shift at >>>> less than 4000 rpms, the engine tends to accelerate VERY slowly (On >>>> the Westy, the big jump between 2nd and 3rd really means I wind >>>> up 2nd >>>> pretty decently.) >>>> >>>> In reviewing all the specs, it occurs to me that while the >>>> aerodynamics make some difference as to the fuel economy, >>>> especially >>>> above 50 mph, it is possible that the final drive ratio is the big >>>> difference. >>>> >>>> I'll have to do a lot more experimenting with driving habits in my >>>> passenger syncro to see if I can't make a significant impact on my >>>> fuel economy. >>>> >> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »