

| Subject: | Re: Why don't we have these kinds of Pop top here in the USA "Atlantic " |
| From: | Mike S |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:06:11 -0400 |
At 04:42 AM 9/27/2008, Kim Brennan wrote... >On Sep 27, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Mike S wrote: > >>At 10:04 PM 9/26/2008, Chris S wrote... >>>The front luggage rack creates a LOT of turbulence and drag. Yes, >>>frontal area is the same but with the rack the drag is much higher. >>> >>><http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b7/misterpolak/Misc%20VW%20nuttiness/windtests.jpg>> >>> >>That shows 5 different configurations, none of which is the oddball >>in >>question. What makes you think #3 is significantly different than >>that >>one? > >The 3rd one down is a traditional US Westy. Notice that the how the >extra height of the luggage rack really blows the smoke and destroys >the laminar flow. > >The 4th one down is closest to the Atlantic poptop. Due to the low >area of the top right above the windshield, the laminar flow is able >to be preserved further down the body of the vehicle. No, not even close, I'm surprised you would even suggest that. #3, the "traditional Westy," is by FAR the closest. Everything from the B pillar back is identical. #4 is VERY different than either, higher and rounded. If you want to make "similarity" comparisons, #4 and a traditional Westy both start the slope from the top of the windshield to their maximum height. The Atlantic has a discontinuity, where that transition is moved back toward the B pillar. The transition is also much steeper. This is the best picture I could find: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pseudonomad/1405892055/ I'm not claiming which might be better, just that those pictures are meaningless with respect to the Atlantic aerodynamics.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »