

| Subject: | Re: Update: Evaluating a "Found" Engine |
| From: | Michael Sullivan |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:10:56 -0600 |
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm looking at a compression test from the stealership that the PO did and > results are:#1-120, #2-125, #3-125, #4-130. dx SAYS ALL ok. > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Paul Guzyk <paullist08@guzyk.com> wrote: > >> Greg, >> Compression of 180-195 in a used waterboxer is really good. Almost too >> good to be true. >> >> I rarely see WBX's with that high of compression. >> >> Are you sure your compression tester is accurate? >> >> >> > >> >The compression numbers were reasonable: 180 - 180 - 195 - 150. I >> >suppose I could try wetting the rings on #4 to see if it comes up a bit, >> > > > > -- > Michael in San Antonio > 91GL AT 'Gringo' > -- Michael in San Antonio 91GL AT 'Gringo'
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »