

| Subject: | Re: Update: Evaluating a "Found" Engine |
| From: | Greg Potts |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:31:38 -0500 |
Hi Michael, I was surprised by those numbers as well, but the compression tester is only a few months old and I have no particular reason to doubt its accuracy. I previously used it to check a good-running T4 air-cooled engine and got 120's all round. It took a few turns of the engine to build up to 180, usually the first stroke brought a 120 and every time the cylinder being tested "fired" the needle would come up a bit. Once it stopped increasing I wrote down the number for that cylinder. There was a fair bit of carbon on the spark plugs on the 1-2 side; it might be that the increased compression on that side is a result of carbon build-up. Happy Trails, Greg Quoting Michael Sullivan <sandwichhead@GMAIL.COM>: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Michael Sullivan > <sandwichhead@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'm looking at a compression test from the stealership that the PO did and >> results are:#1-120, #2-125, #3-125, #4-130. dx SAYS ALL ok. >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Paul Guzyk <paullist08@guzyk.com> wrote: >> >>> Greg, >>> Compression of 180-195 in a used waterboxer is really good. Almost too >>> good to be true. >>> >>> I rarely see WBX's with that high of compression. >>> >>> Are you sure your compression tester is accurate?
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »