

| Subject: | Re: Body work question |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:48:33 -0700 |
> * My question: If the panel can be re-shaped to look the same as it did > before the accident, why is replacement "the right thing to do"? Is it > because he'll make more money replacing it rather than reshaping it (making > it the right thing for HIM to do)? > OR, rather, are there structural integrity issues at play that I've not been > advised of? Reshaping it no doubt means filler. Filler is to be avoided if possible. -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand Fossil preparator Mollusc, Toyota & VW van nut Temporarily in Calgary, AB, Canada <goose1047@gmail.com> ------------------------------------------------------------ + To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to + listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON + in the body of the message. ------------------------------------------------------------
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »