Andre wrote:

>> Actually, the T3 was largely built by robots, as the videos show; what
wasn't robot-done eg handling metal at the stamps would easily be done
so. 70s technology... so what? <<

Yes, but there was still considerably more manual hours put into finishing
it than a T5.  My point was you just can't take the old machines, turn them
back on and start building cheap vans again.

>> Like Toyota's Hiace, the body is modular, for ease of making different
versions on the same line. The engine and drivetrain would be modern, as
would the electrics (the latter best farmed-out to Mitsubishi, for both
design & manufacture). It could also easily be made in say 3 different
wheelbases, again like the superceded gen-3  & 4 (83-04) Hiaces
...
If it was offered in longer-wheelbase versions
...
And if it had a modern drivetrain and performed well MPV-buyers would go for

...
They could use a top-quality suspension (no American-market low-grade
one) and even offer a competition suspension and drivetrains, possibly
sold as a Porsche... how about a T3 racing class?
<<

Hmm, larger body, different drive train, new suspension. You've just
described a completely new and different rear engine van. That was not my
argument. My argument was that the Vanagon can't be built again, not a new
VW Hiace.

Bryan

------------------------------------------------------------
+    To unsubscribe from the Vanagon List send an e-mail to
+    listserv@gerry.vanagon.com with SIGNOFF VANAGON
+    in the body of the message.
------------------------------------------------------------