> I wonder what Zoltan Kuthy has to say for himself?
YES !!! ,,, As Usual Folks ...
We're Only Hearing "One Side of the Story" !!!

> I'm a bit taken back that a professional company would drop names....
ABSOLUTELY !!!
Maybe it is GW that should be worried about a "Law Suit" !!!

Folks,,, It's not too often a seller Accentuates the Negative
at the Expense of the Positive !!!

(It Seems)
A "REBUILT" Engine IS a CHANGE OF SPARK PLUGS TO SOME SELLERS !!!

I ALWAYS TAKE EVERYTHING SAID BY A SELLER
WITH A GRAIN OF SALT !!!

&&& WHEN I DON'T DO THAT ...............
I ALMOST ALWAYS GET (FEEL)  SCR@%$^$&%*D !!!!

JC...
YMMV .....

And, As Usual, List Members .... :o)

Should you or any member of your I.M. Force be captured or killed,
the secretary will disavow any knowledge of your existence.
This tape will self-destruct in five seconds.

Good luck, Zoltan."

-------------- Original message --------------
From: Jim Johnston <inmytree1@GMAIL.COM>

> wow. A interesting read indeed. I wonder what happened to "buyer beware".
> I'm a bit taken back that a professional company would drop names....
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Bob Stevens wrote:
>
> > Just happened to be reading through Go Westy's sale items when I came
> > across the comments by one Syncro owner in dealing with someone I've seen on
> > our van lists, and thought a heads up was appropriate. If this has already
> > been posted then my apologies.
> >
> > http://www.gowesty.com/sale_details.php?id=1127
> >
> > Bob
> > '87 Syncro Westy
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jim
> Wilmington, NC

-------------- Original message --------------
From: Mike <mbucchino@CHARTER.NET>

> "Buyer beware" is always the case. The fact that the buyer took his word for
> it, without thoroughly checking it out for himself shows a certain level of
> inexperience and naivete.
> I don't know about you, but I wouldn't drop $31,500 without a paid
> pre-inspection by a reputable shop. I've sold cars for under $10K that had that
> done first.
> If the seller purposely misrepresented the car, then I believe that he owed
> some money back to to the buyer, or risked a lawsuit for the difference plus
> costs. I think that he should have either asked to reverse the transaction, or
> asked for the difference back, but probably wouldn't have gotten it.
> The fact that it has been subsequently sold and repaired/ modified won't help
> his case in court. I guess he decided to take the hit and recoup as much as
> possible. What an expensive lesson to learn, but I bet he won't do that again.
> I wonder what Zoltan Kuthy has to say for himself?
>
> Mike B.