

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon List Moderator |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:07:15 EST |
In a message dated 1/14/09 10:17:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, sudhir.desai@GMAIL.COM writes: > From my experience (in IRC), having an oligarchy is both a good thing > and a bad thing. > Good when there is open dialogue between moderators, bad when some > people are favored i think if there is to be a moderator on this list, that said person should not favor any one individual, and not be biased towards any one individual. i think that a moderator who harbors resentment towards any one individual would NOT be an appropriate moderator of this forum. the above statement is intended for one person, who by the way has me "blocked" (apparently) over some ridiculous petty dissagreement from 4 years ago which i have long since gotten over and moved on, but apparently he hasnt. repeated attempts to contact the individual have gone unanswered. i think if there is to be a moderator of this forum, said moderartor should be completely unbiased towards listmembers and easy to communicate with. ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De cemailfooterNO62)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »