

| Subject: | Re: On being a Vanaslob (was: sad decline) |
| From: | Zeitgeist |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:32:55 -0800 |
Yeah, I've owned four Vanagons over the years and their utility as a hauler of stuff/detritus was always my paramount interest. Two of mine were campers that ultimately ended up with stripped-out interiors, 'cause the cabinets got in the way of my stuff/detritus hauling endeavors. I will say that I've developed an almost freakish obsession with preserving the groovy stripey upholstery of my current van, so I'm trying to be a responsible slob On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Gary Bawden <goldfieldgary@gmail.com>wrote: > Happy Fryeday, fellow listees! > > Since half of us (according to Scott) are slobs, or at least, half of > the Vanagons he gets were owned by slobs, I thought I'd take it upon > myself to say a few words on our behalf. No disrespect intended here, > Scott, I enjoy your posts and find them informative. > > To me, the Vanagon is a utility vehicle. Oh, sure, I go camping in it, > too, but what other vehicle can you own these days that, after the > weekend, you can take it down to the lumber yard and slide in a few > sheets of plywood? -- Casey '87 300TD '94 100CSQ Avant '89 Bluestar
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »