

| Subject: | Re: Front Spring questions |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Turbovans |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:36:41 -0800 |
sounds good. I would. ----- Original Message ----- From: "neil N" <musomuso@gmail.com> To: "Scott Daniel - Turbovans" <scottdaniel@turbovans.com> Cc: <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 8:38 PM Subject: Re: Front Spring questions > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans > <scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: >> 4/16ths is a quarter inch, which is basically 'no difference' ....... >> and 85 passenger vanagon front springs should be just right, and perhaps >> better than what you have, for your 81. >> >> there are 'tall' 85 front springs........the ones that Weekenders have. >> out of the van, the tall ones are an inch and half taller than the 85 >> passenger van front springs, and more diffiucult to install too. >> >> I put 85 passenger van front springs in my 85 weekender , which had been >> too >> high in front, and it came out just right - like level. >> >> then later we put those 'tall' 85 weekender front springs into a heavily >> loaded 84 Westy...........and that came out just right too, lol. >> >> I think you'll like the 85 passenger van front springs in your 81..... >> if there's anything tired or sagged about your 81 front springs. >> Scott >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "neil N" <musomuso@GMAIL.COM> >> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:32 PM >> Subject: Front Spring questions >> > > That's good to know. .25" compared to 1.5". And likely the .25" > difference between mine is wear. > > I'll swap in the "newer" springs just for the halibut. Can't hurt! > > Thanks Scott, > > Neil.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »