

| Subject: | Re: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? |
| From: | David Kao |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:58:18 -0800 |
I have a cheap CAT on my 84 GL. I believe I paid around $50 only in the late 90's. It looks cheap and I never liked it. But it does the job fine. My 84 just passed a smog test last December. The smog test tech told me that my Vanagon did well considering its age. Since I don't like its look I have been looking for a used OEM one. It is usually available from you-pull junk yard kind of cheap when I wasn't looking. Last time I went to a junk yard there wasn't even a Vanagon to be found. I guess I don't really need one anyway. I am in California. I am not aware of any new specific requirement regarding smog/CAT on old cars. David --- On Mon, 2/9/09, Jeff <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > From: Jeff <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> > Subject: Re: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Date: Monday, February 9, 2009, 3:29 PM > This has been covered before... the main reason California > is requiring all > new catalytic converters to meet OBD-II standards is to > improve the overall > quality of the cats sold in CA. OBD-II cats must come with > 50k mile/5 year > warranties. > > That pretty much eliminates those cheap $100 Vanagon cats. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List > [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Scott Daniel - Turbovans > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 5:51 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? > > thanks for posting the Jerry. > I'll be real curious to find out what the real deal > is...... > since what's quoted below doesn't make a lot of > sense. > > partly what doesn't make sense, as far as I know, is > that a cat for a 1996 > car, for example, isn't any different in how it works > from a cat from a 1986 > car ........... > the later cat might have a spot of a post-cat oxygen sensor > ......... > but the material used in the cat isn't different or > anything like that, as > far as I know..... > it's the entire engine management system that's > different in OBD-II compared > to OBD-I and pre-OBD cars. > > what they are leaving out is the very very fine print > ....the fine print > from Ca that says ( we, the State of California, are > trying to get all > older cars off the road in Ca. ) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "azsun99" <azsun99@EARTHLINK.NET> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:43 PM > Subject: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? > > > >I was browsing a parts catalog (not one of the usual > list vendors) and when > >I looked > > up the catalytic converter for a '90 Vanagon, > there was this note on the > > page: > > "With oxygen sensor hole. New CARB regulations > that went into effect on > > January 1, > > 2009 now require all exhaust catalyst devices that are > sold in California > > regardless > > of model year must meet the tougher OBD II emission > standards that were > > introduced in > > the 1996 model year. Until further notice, this > catalytic converter should > > not be used > > on vehicles registered in California." > > > > Anyone in California subject to CARB rules care to > comment? > > > > Just wondering. > > > > Jerry
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »