

| Subject: | The real story about the invention of the WBX? |
| From: | chris and/or ruth |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:14:55 -0800 |
Don't remember exact numbers, but running a water pump uses less horse power than running the fan to cool the relatively�small displacement, low�HP engine.� A 10% increase is a big deal. This was stated in a car mag in their report on the new powered Vanagon in 1983.� Maybe a dedicated list member could Google it... Not sure if this was the reason,�do 1.9 Vanagons have much more power than the air cooled?� I'm a VW noobie (8 years), not steeped in the rich tradition and lore of VW history.� Still doesn't explain why they didn't go to a in-line 4.� I'm sure there's more to this story. � Chris C 90 Mv � -----------------------------------Jens Jakob wrote:-------------------- So my basic question to this list -����� does anyone know about why VW decided to create the WBX, instead of changing to inline-4 in 1983? Here is what I have found so far: "The switch to water-cooling for the boxer engines was made abruptly mid-year in 1983 because VW could no longer make the air-cooled engines meet emissions standards" Happy driving Jens Jakob
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »