

| Subject: | Re: why would anyone want a diesel |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:25:43 +1300 |
On 12/02/2009, David Marshall <mailinglist@fastforward.ca> wrote: > Hey Scott, putting engines in vehicles is just bad, two sides to both > coins - Diesels can be a lot cheaper than gasoline cars to run, depending where you live. In New Zealand "diesel" fuel costs far less than gas. A good diesel can give very long life, but many designs are slightly or very prone to failure. Cracking heads is rife, especially with turbos. Between us my wife and I have had more than 9 diesel cars or vans, and the only one which wasn't good was the Nissan Skyline 2.8. The others were all Toyotas with 1C-based engines, NA and turbo. Three of these, all NA, did over 600,000km while we had them. They were driven full-throttle the whole time (whenever accelerating from a standstill or in low gears going up the steep hills which Dunedin is composed of). We have broken a cambelt or three (one had done only 80,000km) and blown headgaskets, but the only real design failure we had was the turbodiesel (3C-T) in the 92 Estima cracking its head... and even then, we used it cracked daily for a full year before pulling the head). Diesel performance can range from very poor to pretty good. The only other diesel brand I have driven was a Golf 1 1.6, and it wasn't inspiring. Small NA Toyotas perform satisfactorily, and my Corolla with a 2.0 turbo replacing its 1.8 NA, is certainly fun on Dunedin's steep long hills. When a diesel goes bad it can cost. But repairing a gas engine isn't much cheaper. Just remember to change the oil and filter every 5000km...
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »