

| Subject: | Re: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? |
| From: | Jeff |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:29:23 -0500 |
This has been covered before... the main reason California is requiring all new catalytic converters to meet OBD-II standards is to improve the overall quality of the cats sold in CA. OBD-II cats must come with 50k mile/5 year warranties. That pretty much eliminates those cheap $100 Vanagon cats. Cheers, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Scott Daniel - Turbovans Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 5:51 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? thanks for posting the Jerry. I'll be real curious to find out what the real deal is...... since what's quoted below doesn't make a lot of sense. partly what doesn't make sense, as far as I know, is that a cat for a 1996 car, for example, isn't any different in how it works from a cat from a 1986 car ........... the later cat might have a spot of a post-cat oxygen sensor ......... but the material used in the cat isn't different or anything like that, as far as I know..... it's the entire engine management system that's different in OBD-II compared to OBD-I and pre-OBD cars. what they are leaving out is the very very fine print ....the fine print from Ca that says ( we, the State of California, are trying to get all older cars off the road in Ca. ) ----- Original Message ----- From: "azsun99" <azsun99@EARTHLINK.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 1:43 PM Subject: new CARB rules for cats in Calif? >I was browsing a parts catalog (not one of the usual list vendors) and when >I looked > up the catalytic converter for a '90 Vanagon, there was this note on the > page: > "With oxygen sensor hole. New CARB regulations that went into effect on > January 1, > 2009 now require all exhaust catalyst devices that are sold in California > regardless > of model year must meet the tougher OBD II emission standards that were > introduced in > the 1996 model year. Until further notice, this catalytic converter should > not be used > on vehicles registered in California." > > Anyone in California subject to CARB rules care to comment? > > Just wondering. > > Jerry
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »