

| Subject: | Re: Tires - Why oh why NOT? |
| From: | Zeitgeist |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:31:04 -0700 |
Oopsie, my van's 16" SLK rims are still shod with the same unreinforced Kumhos I bought when they were mounted on my MB--my bad. And for the record, I LOVE the ride and road grip...by far the best upgrade I've ever applied to one of my vans. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Chris S <szpejankowski@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been a Vanagon Westfalia ownder since 2001 and I have ALWAYS > agreed that Vanagons should have reinforced tires on their stock 14'' > wheels. > > Now, what happens when you upgrade to larger wheels? Take this for > instance: > > A 1990 Mercedes 560 SEC weighs about 4000lbs. It rides on 205/60 R15 > tires. The tires are not reinforced. The US version of that > wonderful car had only 236hp and it would push it to nearly 150mph, > with the Euro engine having closer to 300hp. The car is over > engineered in true M-B fashion. It can take 5 adults down twisty > mountain roads in comfort with poise belying its portly weight. Can > you say TIRE LOADS? > > So my question, on this wonderful Friday: Why oh why are Mercedes > 15'' tires NOT good enough for our camper? > > My answer is that our tiny concrete-filled 14'' donuts need to be > reinforced because nothing else in that size can handle 4000lbs of van > and furniture, and the 15'' Mercedes tires and wheels are just fine. > > Take it away, list! FLAME SUIT ON! > > -- > Chris S. > Disclaimer: "Death and serious injury may occur" > -- Casey '87 300TD '94 100CSQ Avant '89 Bluestar
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »