

| Subject: | Re: Tires - Why oh why NOT? |
| From: | Tom Hargrave |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:15:57 -0500 |
There is lot more to tire construction than "reinforced" and "non-reinforced". Speed rating also comes into play with higher speed rated tires having stiffer sidewalls than lower speed rated tires. The 560 SEC is supposed to ride on H speed rated tires, for handling, not speed. BTW, the highest speed rated tires you'll find at WallyWorld will be an S rating, substandard for that car. But WallyWorld will tell you "it's fine" because you don't go that fast. Thanks, Tom 256-656-1924 -----Original Message----- From: "Chris S" <szpejankowski@GMAIL.COM> To: "vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM" <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: 3/13/09 2:25 PM Subject: Tires - Why oh why NOT? I've been a Vanagon Westfalia ownder since 2001 and I have ALWAYS agreed that Vanagons should have reinforced tires on their stock 14'' wheels. Now, what happens when you upgrade to larger wheels? Take this for instance: A 1990 Mercedes 560 SEC weighs about 4000lbs. It rides on 205/60 R15 tires. The tires are not reinforced. The US version of that wonderful car had only 236hp and it would push it to nearly 150mph, with the Euro engine having closer to 300hp. The car is over engineered in true M-B fashion. It can take 5 adults down twisty mountain roads in comfort with poise belying its portly weight. Can you say TIRE LOADS? So my question, on this wonderful Friday: Why oh why are Mercedes 15'' tires NOT good enough for our camper? My answer is that our tiny concrete-filled 14'' donuts need to be reinforced because nothing else in that size can handle 4000lbs of van and furniture, and the 15'' Mercedes tires and wheels are just fine. Take it away, list! FLAME SUIT ON! -- Chris S. Disclaimer: "Death and serious injury may occur" No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/1999 - Release Date: 3/13/2009 5:59 AM
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »