

| Subject: | Re: MODERATOR PRIVATE. Re: Tires - Why oh why NOT? |
| From: | Rob |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:42:42 -0700 |
My apologies to all. It should not have happened. There is no excuse for my behavior this afternoon. Rob At 3/15/2009 03:23 PM, syncro@gmail.com wrote: >Rob, > >Please refrain from using that wonderful word used to describe a >rectal orifice. We are still a G-rated List and such words we use in >our daily lives are just not tolerated here. > >Thanks, >BenT >YDLRO >Your Designated List RO >------Original Message------ >From: Rob >Sender: Vanagon Mailing List >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >ReplyTo: Rob >Subject: Re: Tires - Why oh why NOT? >Sent: Mar 15, 2009 2:55 PM > >At 3/15/2009 02:34 PM, Mike S wrote: > >At 05:04 PM 3/15/2009, Rob wrote... > >>Nope you are wrong on this one, several years at a front end shop > >>showed what DOES happen when running tires under inflated. No doubt > >>on this issue in my mind. > > > >Running at less than "maximum" does not imply under inflated. No > >way, no how. Thinking that the maximum pressure stamped on the > >sidewall is the proper inflation pressure for any vehicle to which > >that tire might possible be mounted is simple ignorance. Repeating > >the error when it's pointed out is simple stupidity. > >Wow, I'm a liar and stupid and called that in public on the list? >Maybe I'm just blind and didn't see what I saw? >What an asshole. >No matter I'm done, I know what happens when tires are under >inflated, I have seen it often. > >My advice is to buy the best tires you can, if you really want to >know what's happening weigh your van (so you know what's happening) >and then buy the best tires you can afford. > > > >Rob >becida@comcast.net > > >Sent via BenTberry by BenTNT > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.15/2003 - Release Date: >03/15/09 14:07:00
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »