

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon |
| From: | Neil2 |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:33:59 -0700 |
I have to agree with most tho' I've not owned a bus. The Vanagons have superior engineering but the buses have beauty/character. It'd be great to have the bus package with the Vanagon's (rear) power plant and the Eurovan/CA interior accoutrements (love that top loading fridge)! On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Ken Wilford <kenwilfy@comcast.net> wrote: > Buses are cool for the "smiles per hour" factor but the actual driving > down the road is not much fun for the driver. You have a very squirrely > steering and suspension system, sound deadening is pretty much > non-existant (you get major trash can lid shutting noise every time you > shut a door) and the air cooled engines are time bombs (they make the > waterboxer seem super reliable in comparison). The 73-83.5 engines are > the worst and most expensive/hard the get parts for engines I know of. > Bob Donalds did like to rebuild these engines because they were so > tricky that after 30 years they would still throw him for a loop now and > then. I loved driving around a 66 bus that I restored for a guy a > couple of years ago. I took short trips to town and everyone smiled and > waved to me. To go farther than 10 miles I take my Vanagon. > > Ken Wilford > John 3:16 > www.vanagain.com > > > > Tieitup wrote: > >> Why do you all love your vanagons so much over the air cooled busses. what >> is it, the possibility that maybe their more reliable?the body style or >> just >> possibly because you have one and love her dearly. >> >> adam >> 88 westy getting skinned this week for work >> >> >> -- Neil2 '82 Diesel Westfalia (USS Tinosa) '86 Vanagon/Westfalia Wannabe (SaVannah) Nunquam Pendite Divendium
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »