

| Subject: | Re: Sequential vs batch RE: digifant injection |
| From: | Zeitgeist |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:15:21 -0700 |
Ya know, I've been tinkering with these beasties for over twenty years, and this is the first I've heard of L-Jet and Digifant being "batch-fire" injected...so, does that mean that you could swap the injection plugs between cylinders and there'd be no difference? Wow, that's mind-boggling. It's like you've exposed Santa, the easter bunny and Area 51 all at once...I'm deflated. I need a drink...or a toke...damn On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: > Even with sequential fuel injection, intake valve opening events happen so > fast that by 2-3k rpm the injector is spraying part of the fuel on closed > intake valves anyway. The fuel just doesn't have that much time to pool. > > Sequential is good for emissions and improves economy slightly. If you > spend much time in traffic or light cruise, this may be a good upgrade. > > For max power, a batch fire system is just as good as sequential. > -- Casey '87 300TD '94 100CSQ Avant '89 Bluestar
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »