

| Subject: | Re: Sequential vs batch RE: digifant injection |
| From: | Zeitgeist |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Apr 2009 21:46:53 -0700 |
Even when I was wrenching on these and other Euro cars for a living, the injection system never was an issue requiring further investigation. I've never had a problem with Digifant...or L-Jet for that matter. CIS on the other hand, that always had its issues...and D-Jet, fuhgetaboutit On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans < scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > wow, that's saying something ......... > if you consider it toke-worthy to have discovered after all this time that > it doesn't matter which injector wire you plug onto which injector on a > waterboxer vanagon engine. > You can also see it in the wiring diagrams, > for example on page 97.106........... > it shows one white wire connecting pin 12 of the ECU to all four injectors. > As long as we know they don't digitize or 'can-bus' 4 signals on that one > wire ( which they don't of course ) ....it shows right there that the ECU > fires the 4 injectors as one big injector. And it does it by supplying > ground to them to energize them, like one big four-part injector. > > and it would be shocking to think something worked one way for 20 years, > only to discover after all that time it's different than you thought ! > Welcome to 2009 - lol ! :-) > Scott > www.turbovans.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeitgeist" <gruengeist@GMAIL.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:15 PM > Subject: Re: Sequential vs batch RE: digifant injection > > > > Ya know, I've been tinkering with these beasties for over twenty years, >> and >> this is the first I've heard of L-Jet and Digifant being "batch-fire" >> injected...so, does that mean that you could swap the injection plugs >> between cylinders and there'd be no difference? Wow, that's >> mind-boggling. >> It's like you've exposed Santa, the easter bunny and Area 51 all at >> once...I'm deflated. I need a drink...or a toke...damn >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> Even with sequential fuel injection, intake valve opening events happen >>> so >>> fast that by 2-3k rpm the injector is spraying part of the fuel on closed >>> intake valves anyway. The fuel just doesn't have that much time to pool. >>> >>> Sequential is good for emissions and improves economy slightly. If you >>> spend much time in traffic or light cruise, this may be a good upgrade. >>> >>> For max power, a batch fire system is just as good as sequential. >>> >>> >> -- >> Casey >> '87 300TD >> '94 100CSQ Avant >> '89 Bluestar >> > > -- Casey '87 300TD '94 100CSQ Avant '89 Bluestar
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »