

| Subject: | Re: Engine Rebuild Questions |
| From: | Tom Hargrave |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:54:03 -0500 |
These days it's pretty much "take it easy" for the first 500 miles. Thanks, Tom Hargrave www.kegkits.com http://www.kegkits.com/JABF/ 256-656-1924 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Stewart [mailto:robertmstewart@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:50 AM To: Tom Hargrave Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Engine Rebuild Questions Is there a rule of thumb as to not exceeding a certain speed limit on the new engine during break in? i.e. don't drive faster than 40mph? for 500 miles? On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Tom Hargrave wrote: > 1. The pistons may look fine but do they measure fine? Are the ring > lands, > skirts, etc, etc still in tolerance? In my opinion, Mahle is best. > > 2. The cam & followers should be replaced as a set. Replace one & > you should > replace the other. > > 3. Break-in is usually 500 miles - by then the rings should be worn > to the > profile of the cylinder walls. I always change my oil & filter after > 500 > miles because break-in is really a short term very high wear period > for the > engine and I want to get all of the micro-fine bits of metal out of > the > engine. > > Thanks, > Tom Hargrave > www.kegkits.com > http://www.kegkits.com/JABF/ > 256-656-1924 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On > Behalf Of > Robert Stewart > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:50 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Engine Rebuild Questions > > I spoke with Pete from Van Cafe where I am ordering most of the parts > and he too suggested replacing the rod bolts thanks for the > suggestion. > > I a couple more questions... > > 1. Why is it important to replace the Pistons if they look fine? I > understand the rings and other components but why the actual piston? > > What brand of pistons is best? > I see the several brands: > - German made Mahle which are most expensive > - QSC from China > - Brazilian > - What are peoples experience with the 96MM Big Bore Kit from QSC? > Worth the extra horsepower or does it create to many problems with > heat in the engine and not a long lasting product? > > 2. If there is no visible wear on the camshaft does that still need to > be replaced? > > 3. What is the proper break in period after a rebuild? > I have heard that after driving the van for 500 miles I should change > the tranny fluid and oil? > > > Thanks, > Robert > Orange County NY > > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Jake de Villiers wrote: > >> Replace the rod bolts with the uprated components - they are the >> weak point in the 2.1 motor. >> >> Pretty sure someone already brought this up in this thread... >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Robert Stewart <robertmstewart@mac.com >>> wrote: >> Just got back from a meeting the rebuilder and we are replacing: >> >> oil pressure valve >> oil pressure relief piston spring >> All New Lifters >> New AMC Spanish Heads >> Wrist Pin Bushings >> Cam Shaft - Reground from Van-Cafe >> Complete Gaskets Replacement of All seals >> Piston Cylinder Kit - From Van Cafe - German Mahle ( does anyone >> recommend the 2.2 piston kit from Vanagain or GW?) >> Piston Engine Ring Set - Grant Brand >> Standard Main Bearing Set >> Crank Shaft bearing kit >> Rod Bearings - Standard >> New Temp Sensor with Lower threshold to keep the engine cooler* - Van >> Cafe 80 degree >> New Oil Pressure Sensors >> >> >> The rebuilder said all the other parts looked good. >> >> Indeed he has done these before he said and he realizes the >> complicated nature of how torque ratio's and well as the extreme >> precision of the tolerances are required. In fact he said he really >> dislikes working on all the German engines regardless if it is VW, >> Mercedes or BMW. For him hey says they use way to many bolts and >> misc. >> parts to complicate the process. He told me once the parts arrive he >> can have it done within 3-4 days. Sound about right? >> >> Am I missing any other crucial parts to replace? >> >> He said the crank, stud bolts and other key parts all looked good and >> said the engine seems in otherwise good shape for its age. >> >> Thanks for assistance. >> >> Rob >> NY >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 6, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Robert Stewart wrote: >> >> Good Monday to everyone, >> >> I have a local engine rebuilder working on my 2.1 Automatic engine >> which had roughly 250,000 miles on it. >> >> He informed my heads needed to be replaced. I could clearly see the >> space between the two valves having a indentation bridging them and >> the surface areas were very badly pitted. >> >> I planned on purchasing a set of rebuilt heads from Van-Cafe, anyone >> think this a good or bad idea? >> Anyone used them before? Have any feedback? >> >> Secondly is there anything regarding the rebuild that is a must to >> replace component wise since he has it all apart? >> i.e. sleeves, pistons, camshaft etc... >> >> I am awaiting a final parts list from him now but want to be sure I >> am >> not missing anything. >> >> Before he rebuilds it he is going to be cleaning all the parts in a >> special bath then glass bead blasting the non sensitive parts. >> >> Also how long should a standard rebuild take? i.e. 7-21 days? or is >> it >> something that can be done in a 40 hour work week? >> What kind of price should I expect? >> He told me it would be roughly $1500 dollars. >> He said he would be check to see if the camshaft needed to be >> reground >> and would check all valves etc. His shop only does rebuilds but of >> mostly race car engines and big truck engines so I trust he knows >> what >> he is talking about. He is not a VW guy at all he just knows engines. >> I did give him the Bentley just to be safe though. >> >> Any advice would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert >> NY >> >> >> >> -- >> Jake >> >> 1984 Vanagon GL >> 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" >> >> Crescent Beach, BC >> >> www.crescentbeachguitar.com >> http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27 > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.44/2044 - Release Date: > 4/6/2009 > 6:59 PM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.44/2044 - Release Date: > 4/6/2009 > 6:59 PM No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.44/2044 - Release Date: 4/6/2009 6:59 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.44/2044 - Release Date: 4/6/2009 6:59 PM
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »