

| Subject: | Re: Surepower 1315 and charging issues |
| From: | Keith Ovregaard |
| Date: | Tue, 5 May 2009 21:07:59 -0700 |
Thanks for that info, Mark. I see that the 1314 is unidirectional vs the 1315 is bi-directional. Looks like I have the wrong separator for my setup. A search on the Samba brought up info on the subject and the 1314 was suggested when used with solar and/or an AC charger. Too bad that info was not there when I bought the 1315! Time for a work-around. On May 5, 2009, at 7:13 PM, mark drillock wrote: > Reasons like this are why they offer a 1314 model that only combines > when the charging source is on a particular side. > > Other reasons for the 1314 include people using solar panels since > the 1314/1315 use power when combined and small solar panel users > will not want to waste any power. > > Mark > > > > Keith Ovregaard wrote: >> After reading the recent posts regarding the Surepower 1315, >> Vitrifrigo, aux battery wiring, etc., I was curious if a battery >> charger or Progressive Dynamics converter/charger would charge the >> batteries separately or in the combined mode. So I went down to the >> garage to grab my battery charger and volt meter. The charger was >> connected directly to the aux battery terminals and then I metered >> the >> two main terminals on the Surepower 1315. They read the same as the >> charger voltage meter, so the batteries were combined. This is NOT a >> good thing when you have a deep cycle battery in need of a good de- >> sulfating charge. My starting battery is a plain old group 41 >> Interstate. That got me thinking that I should install two battery >> shut-off switches to manually isolate the two batteries. The switches >> would also provide emergency shutdown of all 12 volt power and I >> suppose it could be used as a theft deterrent, too. >> Any thoughts or experiences relating to this setup? >> Keith O. >> 90 Westy Syncro "VikingWagen"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »