

| Subject: | Re: AMC valves, Boston Bob |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Tue, 26 May 2009 15:33:43 -0700 |
I'm with Jeff. If an 'improved' head with better valves and tweaked keepers is only $100 more than an AMC head that is good for ~30,000 miles, why would I want to cheap out? The labour to re & re the head that swallowed a valve will be at least $1000, you and they'll want to check the other side too that's $2000 plus towing etc. Why wouldn't you want to do it right the first time? I know which shop I'd get my heads replaced at - the one that does the best job *ONCE*! On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Jeff <vw.doka@gmail.com> wrote: > Ken, > > Actually, the wholesale cost of a bare (no valves, springs or keepers) AMC > head is substantially below $300, so a $499 "upgraded" head is easily > doable. > > Even the wholesale cost of a complete AMC head is below your example below > of $389. > > As for valves... wholesale cost of "better" exhaust valves is less than > $25, > intakes are less than $10. When I say "better", I'm referring to TRW > valves > that are made in Germany. > > And these are my prices. A large company that purchases in bulk will get > much better pricing. > > > One thing that we commonly do is to reuse the original VW valves (if they > are within specifications) on new AMC heads. > > > Cheers, > > Jeff > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Wilford [mailto:kenwilfy@comcast.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 5:32 PM > To: VW Doka > Cc: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: AMC valves, Boston Bob > > Jeff, > OK, let's pretend that you are going to replace your exhaust valves with > "better" ones that are around $35 each. This is just exhaust valves > however there are two of these per head ($70) then you are going to want > to use "better" intake valves which run around $20 each ($40 per head). > So just in valves you are talking about adding $110 in cost per head. > Now look at what folks are charging for the heads with the "better" > valves. A certain company who shall remain nameless is selling their > "better" valve heads for $499 each. This would mean that they would > have to buy their heads at $389 each just to break even (not making any > money and not factoring in their labor). The heads just aren't this > cheap. Even if they could get the heads for $300 (way below what anyone > can actually get them for wholesale) you are talking about only making > $89 per head which wouldn't be worth it. That might cover your labor in > removing, installing and lapping the valves but that is it. No profit. > The math just doesn't work. The only way it works out is if you take > the AMC valves out and put something else in that is relatively cheap. > I know one particular rebuilder who shall remain nameless who was > replacing the AMC valves with aftermarket stainless ones that he could > get pretty cheaply. This was working well for him for a while until he > ran into a bad batch of these aftermarket valves that had improperly > heat treated stems and had valves start failing on him. So the very > "problem" that he was supposed to be fixing by replacing the valves was > the thing that started happening. Ironic, isn't it? > > So if people wanted to pay a premium for heads with OE valves installed > I would have no problem with that. People can pay a premium to get > premium valves. However when a company says their heads are better when > they are putting in aftermarket valves which may or may not be any > better than what they are replacing I just don't think this is right. > Just my opinion. > > Ken Wilford > John 3:16 > www.vanagain.com > > VW Doka wrote: > > >From my experience, they start to show significant valve stem wear > > around 20k miles. Failure around 40k miles. > > > > The bad batch story is just that... a story. The AMC heads sold today > > still use the same cheap, crappy exhaust valves as the ones from 5 > > years ago. You can buy the same valves brand new for about $7. A > > good exhaust valve for the WBXer runs about $35. > > > > Not conjecture, not really opinion... just my experience. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Robert Keezer <warmerwagen@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > >> Very logical . After all, how would a company like this stay in business > year after year with notoriously bad valves? > >> It just did'nt make sense. > >> > >> I think Kens' answer is reasonable fro me to go by. > >> > >> One bad batch has perpetuated this myth all these years. I never > believed it . > >> > >> Most of my Vanagons sold with AMC heads and never a complaint. > >> Which is why I asked, how long do they last? This bad batch head? > >> > >> If they went bad in 5 years, I would'nt expect to hear from the buyer . > >> One year or less maybe . Less than 6 months probably. > >> > >> Robert > >> 1982 Westfalia > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Ken Wilford <kenwilfy@COMCAST.NET> wrote: > >> > >> > >> From: Ken Wilford <kenwilfy@COMCAST.NET> > >> Subject: Re: AMC valves, Boston Bob > >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 12:18 PM > >> > >> > >> I spent a bunch of time on the phone with Bob talking about this subject > >> as well, but I believe all of this fear and loathing about the AMC > >> valves is due to a bad batch of these heads back about 6 or 7 years > >> ago. I have never had a failure like the one Bob always warned me about > >> and I never changed the valves from the stock ones. Recently I had a > >> pair of AMC heads that I installed on an engine about two years ago come > >> back into my possession (engine threw a rod). The heads had about 18k > >> miles on them. I took the heads to a machine shop to have them checked > >> and a valve job done before selling the heads to a list member. I asked > >> the machine shop about the condition of the valve keepers, grooves on > >> the valve stems, etc. He said that he had inspected them and they were > >> like new condition and that they valves themselves were also in like new > >> condition. I can say that I have never had an AMC head fail in 11 years > >> of installing them. I have never had one that I have sold to a customer > >> fail due to a bad valve either. Anything can fail if you abuse it, or > >> improperly install it, or don't correctly adjust the valves, etc. > >> However I have never found the stock AMC valves to have any issues. If > >> you want to spend extra money on "better" valves and install them only > >> to have them fail (I have known this to happen) that is your choice. > >> However the stigma against using the AMC heads out of the box is totally > >> unfounded as far as I am concerned. > >> > >> Just my experience, > >> Ken Wilford > >> John 3:16 > >> www.vanagain.com > >> > >> > >> Zoltan wrote: > >> > >>> One important fact I learned from Bob, was that the AMC heads have > loose > keepers. The two halves meet each other to touch, thus grabbing the valve > stem, being loose, they travel up and down until they break through the > grooves and the valve free to move deeper inside and then operated by the > piston to have it pushed up. > >>> So, the first thing I recomment to anyone I meet is to have the keepers > ground at their sides until they don't touch each other. > >>> Bob was very happy with the AMC heads and tossed the old ones for their > metal fatigue. In his experience, it was not worth chancing all the > troubles by putting the old ones back. > >>> He liked the better material the AMC heads are made of. > >>> So, the keepers must be fixed first. > >>> Zoltan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.thebassspa.com www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »