

| Subject: | Re: gov't sure fire way to destroy an engine Re: about oil additives |
| From: | Jim Akiba |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:49:47 -0400 |
The only engines that can obtain an EO for blanket anti-tampering exemption are pre-OBDII (read 95/96 and older) engines, so no newer engine swaps cannot be exempted in the same way, "they" won't even look at a filed application. This is the policy shift and is the reason an older early 90s subie ej22 can be legal if you follow the KEP EO, but a cleaner even more modern version of the same engine would not be able to get an exemption. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, John Rodgers<inua@charter.net> wrote: > Jim Akiba wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:30 PM, John Rodgers<inua@charter.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Next thing you know "They" will be dictating that no engine replacements >>> or >>> engine upgrade swaps of newer engines into older vehicles are to be >>> permitted either. >>> >> >> lol you mean like CA already does? >> >> Jim Akiba >> >> >> > > I have not really paid to much attention to CA. Do "They" really not allow > newer modern engines to be swapped into older vehicles likes Vanagons? I > like to think I could swap out my tired old WBX for a newer Suburu engine or > Zetec and still drive in CA. > > John Rodgers > 88 GL Driver > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »