

| Subject: | Re: Smog test failed - here is my plan |
| From: | Roland |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:22:08 -0700 |
Mark, Thanks, that is a very generous offer. In the meantime I did drop it off at one of those CAP certified smog/repair places since I think it can save some $ from the part that the state will pay. Feels somewhat silly, since I seem to be going from place to place without understanding the details on it all. Depending on what I hear from them next, I may be driving over there to get some real answers. Thanks again. Roland On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, mark drillock <mdrillock@cox.net> wrote: > Roland, the most critical thing is that the O2 sensor system be working and > cycling fast. This is simple to check. I live near you and have the same > smog testing issues with my 3 gasoline Vanagons. I always make certain the > O2 is working well before taking a vehicle in for test and always pass when > it is. > > You must look at both the voltage and cycle time of the O2 system. I have > an oscilloscope that I use for this except on 2.1 waterboxers where I use a > Digitool. > > Come on over and we can look at yours. > > Mark > > > > > > Roland wrote: > >> Hi Rich, >> >> Thanks for the data point. The is the cat part number on the Van-Cafe web >> site. I called them this morning and they confirmed it is not California >> legal. I think it is related to all the new CARB rules that went into >> effect this year in 2009. Perhaps yours went through because it was still >> 2008. There are some emails in the archives from the past 8 months >> discussing the new CARB rules, but I still don't understand it all >> (related >> to OBD issues, and CAT types, etc.). Evidently California changed some of >> the regulations in the meantime. >> >> Mine had passed smog 2 years ago, no problem. And also 4 years ago, no >> problem. Who knows, maybe the cat did wear out and that is what is >> needed. >> Frustrating because it was running very well, even the shop said it is all >> is very good shape and running well -- (oops, I might get started down a >> controversial discussion if I complain about spending all these $ on a >> vehicle that runs very well, all in good shape, except that the peoples >> republic of california is making me spend loads of extra $ for >> questionable >> reasons). >> >> Roland >> (also in the San Diego area). >> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »