

| Subject: | Re: Dometic Rear Fan *prop* Better than CPU Fan? |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:38:40 -0400 |
At 05:33 PM 8/4/2009, neil N wrote: >Has anyone else found that the Dometic blade is a better design than a >muffin fan? Muffin (R) and similar box-type fans are designed to be thin so as to mount easily into equipment chassis and such. As such they have coplanar motors and in the smaller sizes (less than 8-inch, say) there isn't much room for the fan blades. As such they run fast and noisy for a given output. The Dometic fan OTOH was designed to run slow and quiet (rated input power is 0.7 watts, BTW, about 60 ma -- so at 270 ma yours obviously has problems or is in fact not an original) without regard to size. >And could anyone tell my why the cassette tape motor fan spins faster >when polarity reversed? Cassette drive motors have a speed regulator on them. The old ones were centrifugal but I suspect yours is electronic and won't work on reverse polarity. -- David Beierl - Providence RI USA -- http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '89 Po' White Star "Scamp"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »