Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Dometic Rear Fan *prop* Better than CPU Fan?
From:neil N
Date:Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:37:03 -0700

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, David Beierl<dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote:

> Muffin (R) and similar box-type fans are designed to be thin so as to mount
> easily into equipment chassis and such. �As such they have coplanar motors
> and in the smaller sizes (less than 8-inch, say) there isn't much room for
> the fan blades. �As such they run fast and noisy for a given output. �The
> Dometic fan OTOH was designed to run slow and quiet (rated input power is
> 0.7 watts, BTW, about 60 ma -- so at 270 ma yours obviously has problems or
> is in fact not an original) without regard to size.
>

Thanks David.

Appreciate the insights into fan design. Makes total sense. I can see
what you mean in terms of blade design.

Likely my Dometic motor dirty inside and/or has worn armature
bushings. Found it curious there was such a relatively high draw for
what looks like a small motor. Either that or I used my VOM
incorrectly. Pretty sure it was wired in correctly though.

Neil.

-- 
Neil Nicholson '81 VanaJetta 2.0 "Jaco"

http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/

http://groups.google.com/group/vanagons-with-vw-inline-4-cylinder-gas-engines