

| Subject: | Re: Was: Go Westie engine....Then !.8 turbo swap |
| From: | Mark Dearing |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:52:47 EDT |
In a message dated 8/29/2009 4:39:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, tstone8359@AOL.COM writes: My experience with a 1.8 T as installed in my wife's 2004 Passat is that there was an oil sludge problem which caused a restriction of oil flow to the crank bearings and other critical places. ?The engine was replaced under warranty by VW with less than 50k miles on it. ?I always changed the oil regularly and used the recommended viscosity, so it wasn't the lack of maintenance that caused the problem. ?I recently ordered some new oil filters for the Passat. ?They are now larger, like a Vanagon diesel filter. ?I am assuming that this redesign was done, in part, to attempt to address the sludge problem. ?If you google "1.8T" and "sludge", you will find that I was not alone with my problem and that many of the engines in the junkyard referred to earlier most likely died of sludge-related issues rather than excessive chipping or timing belt failure. Tom This is very true and one reason I wouldn't choose this motor. Now it has been shown that if you use synt. oil this problem is less likely to happen. Also VW had BG products make a system to remove the engine sludge. This system isn't sold to the public only to VW dealers .BG does sell a product for compression performance restoration that would probably work, but there is a warning on it that says do not use on badly sludged engines. I personally installed a 1.8 92 jetta motor in my vanagon mainly cause I had everything to do it with and I really like these motors. needs about 20 more HP to make it right. later mark dearing
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »