

| Subject: | Re: Dare I start a Tire thread? 15" Nokian Hakka C |
| From: | Kim Brennan |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:54:56 -0400 |
Have to be careful as Hakka C's are not the same as CS's or C2's. There are C's that are non-directional. And hence it is difficult to directly compare the two. I think, in general Melissa, you'll be pleased with the Hakka's. On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Bob Stevens wrote: > I had the C2 studdable snow tire without studs Melissa and really > liked > them. Great rain/winter/offroad driving tire, good wear.The only thing > "inconvenient" about them is that they are directional, making tire > rotation > a little tedious over the long haul > on a Syncro. The difference in stability between them and the > Michelins I > had before was incomparable. Very laterally stable > I suspect both for the shorter side ration (65) and belts of the "C" > rating. > http://www.tiresbyweb.com/p-7013-nokian-hakkapeliitta-c2.aspx > I think you'll like your choice. Just can't go wrong with Nokian > Hakka's. > > bob > '87 Syncro Westy >> >> >> If anyone has comments on these Nokian Hakka C tires, I'd like to >> hear them now before I order them. >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »