

| Subject: | Re: Nominations are now open: Top 10 Ugliest Parts to Fail |
| From: | Bruce Todd |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:27:27 -0700 |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Rocket J Squirrel < camping.elliott@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, that Friday thread generated only 9 posts, most of which were a > debate about the availability of the plastic coolant tower thing, and two > nominations by Jim Arnott for the the 1.9 "H" pipe and the 1.9 upper > thermostat housing. That post garnered no comments. > > So . . . would it be fair to say that the 1.9 "H" pipe and upper thermo > housing are the only parts on the Vanagon which are effectively unobtanium > and without them the van would be effectively immobilized? > > Well maybe this might spawn some discussion: What about the 2.9 metre long > / 9' brakeline which runs from front to rear - getting one of those made up > and bent into shape is not a typical saturday walk in the park - heaven > forbid finding a good used one and or installing it! Without brakes you > can't really operate a vehicle - unless your on a farm. > BT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »