

| Subject: | Re: Merffler options? |
| From: | Jake de Villiers |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:29:37 -0700 |
Did I mistakenly surf to the 'Republican List'? On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Don Hanson <dhanson928@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems to me that Big Business is already working on getting the > Government to make it difficult/expensive to keep our cars for this "longer > time" you mention. And we, the vehicle owners, just go "Oh well, it's the > law". They (California leads the way, the other states follow) seem to be > trending towards changing rules now without providing for any > 'grandfathering' of vehicles built before the new rule...They've begun > laying the financial burden of getting a "variance" to a recent new rule > right on the owners of older vehicles.. > So even though we'd LIKE to keep an effective, paid-for, good running > vehicle with plenty of useful potential miles left in it, it becomes > easier/less expensive to "junk it" and go buy a new, "better" one that > complies with all the newest rules. Good for the auto industry and good > for > the politicians they've paid to pass the rules. ..not so good for us. > Midas' Lifetime Warrantee probably would only have to last half a dozen > years from now...then the vehicle with the Midas muffler will become > legally "inconvenient" to keep on the road because it won't "comply" with > the newest rules any longer. > Don Hanson > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:39 PM , Dennis Haynes wrote: > > > > The Midas lifetime warranty is a bit of a "come on" > >> > > > > We all recognize that the business premises of "life time" warranty, > > whether Midas or anyone else, is that most folks will (1) lose the > > paperwork, (2) sell the vehicle (these warranties always say "to the > > original purchaser"), or (3) just forget. I was told at a tire shop > > that offers a free replacement road hazard warranty that they are able > > to do that because they simply get almost no claims. It's not that > > tires don't fail due to damage, but that most folks even forget the > > warranty exists, or the vehicle the tires are on gets sold. Wonder how > > that is going to play out with the much longer times that folks are > > keeping cars (according to national data, not just my perception). > > > > On the other hand, my brother bought tires from that company, and has > > now had two replacement tires because he drives on rough roads. > > > > But, if one enforces the warranty, will Midas weasel? Wouldn't seem to > > make business sense. > > > -- Jake 1984 Vanagon GL 1986 Westy Weekender "Dixie" Crescent Beach, BC www.thebassspa.com www.crescentbeachguitar.com http://subyjake.googlepages.com/mydixiedarlin%27
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »