

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon emissions |
| From: | Michael Snow |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:45:52 -0400 |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tobin Copley <tcopley@sfu.ca> wrote: > A bicycle satisfies points B and C just fine. �And given that most trips are just a few miles or less, a bicycle serves the purpose just fine. �And yes, a bike is just fine in the rain and down to 15 below or so. And arguably better in many snow conditions than a car. > > Bike more, drive less? �That oughta help, right? > No doubt - any of my three bicycles cost less to operate and pollute the planet less than my Vanagon or full-size Toyota Tundra pickup. If your goal is to live efficiently, walk or ride when you can and drive when you must. In the context of motor vehicle life-cycle emissions and operating cost, I stand by my assertions. -- Michael Snow 1982 Westfalia 1.9TD http://slowmachine82.blogspot.com/
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »