

| Subject: | Re: Maps vs GPS |
| From: | Chuck Mathis |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:35:59 -0500 |
I agree with Poppie. My Dad always used maps for our family travels and taught me to read them early on. In the Coast Guard I was a Quartermaster - navigation specialist. Even with the advent of GPS we still used paper charts - electronic charts weren't in wide use when my seagoing career ended. When I travel now I use a 'dumb' GPS - a Garmin GPS III+ - with no spiffy color screen or voice directions and maps. Sometimes rental car maps, sometimes a Rand-McNally road atlas, sometimes USGS Quads. I also carry a handheld compass just in case. The beauty of the GPS is that one can be confused but never really lost - as long as the batteries are charged and you have a signal. Chuck '85 Wolfsburg Westy - 'Roland the Road Buffalo' On Oct 11, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Automatic digest processor wrote: > ate: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:05:06 -0700 > From: Poppie Jagersand <poppie.jagersand@YAHOO.CA> > Subject: Re: Maps vs GPS > > Maps and GPS are complementary. > With just the GPS one becomes myopic. I know people who drive by > GPS, get where they need to, but have no idea of the "lay of the > land". They simply become slaves of the directions of the device, > and should need arise they cannot navigate on their own because they > lack the big picture. > > Maps give a great big picture, but it is difficult to keep all the > details in ones head so at least when I'm driving alone it is great > to have the GPS call out the directions in tricky traffic situations.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »