

| Subject: | Re: Friday engine conversions |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Turbovans |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:13:42 -0700 |
it's not nonsense. makes perfect sense ....... a true boxer does not share rods on the same journal like V engines do. Our waterboxer 4 cylinder vanagon engines are true boxers that way. If there were journals with two rods on them, sharing one crank journal, which would be a crank with only two 'throws' on it. it would be a flat , or 180 degree, V-4. it's natural to assume it just means opposing cylinders in one plane. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Grebneff" <goose1047@GMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 2:22 PM Subject: Re: Friday engine conversions On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:46 AM, pdooley <psdooley@verizon.net> wrote: > There is apparently a rigid boxer definition in which the connecting rods > cannot share crank journals. > Most "V" engines share crank journals and are therefore not internally > balanced. > True boxers have separate journals and therefore paired pistons travel in > opposite directions and balance forces. > > I just learned this myself. I thought any 180 degree motor was a boxer. Sounds like nonsense. I guess then it's really a 180-degree split-inline. -- Regards Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand Fossil preparator Mollusc, Toyota & VW van fanatic
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »