

| Subject: | Re: Friday engine conversions |
| From: | Scott Daniel - Turbovans |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:55:55 -0700 |
well, I guess we'll have to see. I have always assumed it was just about cylinder arrangement myself, but I have read ...........some 6 years or more ago, something like that ...... about flat opposed engines ( Road & Track Mag ) that were really 180 degree V-8's, or V-10's etc. this 'new way of definnning it' explains that statement. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Grebneff" <goose1047@GMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 4:33 PM Subject: Re: Friday engine conversions > it's not nonsense. > makes perfect sense ....... a true boxer does not share rods on the same > journal like V engines do. > Our waterboxer 4 cylinder vanagon engines are true boxers that way. > If there were journals with two rods on them, sharing one crank journal, > which would be a crank with only two 'throws' on it. > it would be a flat , or 180 degree, V-4. > > it's natural to assume it just means opposing cylinders in one plane. So a V8 with separate big-ends wouldn't be a V. It's the cylinder layout that counts, not the number or sharing of bearing journals. -- Regards Andrew Grebneff Dunedin, New Zealand Fossil preparator Mollusc, Toyota & VW van fanatic
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »