

| Subject: | vanagon speed (was Re: Heart vs. Head |
| From: | Joy Hecht |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:38:35 -0500 |
Well of course vanagons are slow! They have low-power engines and they are heavy. They are slow on flat ground - of course they are even slower going up long grades. On long gradual grades, the kind you don't see with the eye, I find myself not going above the 50s, if that - the lack of power is how I realize I'm on a grade. Steep hills I do at 20-25 mph. Definitely you're going to climb to the continental divide in the right lane with the 18-wheelers while cars and SUVs rush past in the left lane. If you wanted a vehicle that would make good time on long drives, why would you have a vanagon? Joy > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mark Hineline <hineline@helix.ucsd.edu > >wrote: > > > Okay, a couple of points to consider. > > > > First, I had a '76 bus named Peregrine. Greg mentioned my trials and > > tribulations with Peregrine. > > > > Second, and this is really the kicker, my number one destination is > > the Colorado Plateau -- Grand Canyon, Flagstaff, Cedar Mesa. From San > > Diego thats' 500 to 600 miles and an 8000 foot gain in elevation. In > > my GTI I can do it in 7 hours. I'm guessing that in a watercooled > > Vanagon I'm looking at 10 to 12 hours for the same trip. > > > > Sound right? Are Vanagons slow pulling long grades? > > > > Mark > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »