

| Subject: | Re: vanagon speed (was Re: Heart vs. Head |
| From: | Al Knoll |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 |
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Joy Hecht <jhecht@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Well of course vanagons are slow! They have low-power engines and they are > heavy. They are slow on flat ground - of course they are even slower going > up long grades. > Hmmm, you been watchin me hike? > If you wanted a vehicle that would make good time on long drives, why would > you have a vanagon? > > Joy > > Says it all. I have a vanagon for the "Joy" of blasting past the poppies at full mosey. My old beast (Bessie the Charolais Camper) is quite content to leave a little earlier and arrive a little later with grazing stops along the way for refreshment, recreation, refueling and throwing things at the rest stop. (previous poster's answer to long boring drives on the superslab). Shunpikin' and following the example of Ghost Dancer makes almost every journey a new wonder. (see Blue Highways--WIlliam Least Heat Moon). Mo' slowah, mo' bettah. Pensionerd.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »