

| Subject: | Re: Snow tires... 2 or 4? |
| From: | Mark A Kippert |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:40:11 -0500 |
Went back to buy the tires but decided against them. According to the stamp (1903) it appears they were manufactured sometime around May, 2003. That and the price went up $100 (a different guy that helped me the first time. This time the owner). What bothered me more was that when I asked him them how old they were he said he didn't know. I suppose he assumed I wouldn't know how to determine it myself. Oh well, I figured the original price of $200 was too good to be true. Mark K 1986 GL/2WD/4SPD On Jan 2, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Dave Mcneely wrote: > Tire age may be determined by looking at a set of numbers on the > sidwall > that show the month and year of manufacture. So > that you get it right, I'm not going to tell you, but instead suggest > that you look it up on a DOT website, which you can google. > > David Mc > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Mark A Kippert wrote: > >> Not looking to start another tire thread, just a question on how >> many, >> and how old. I'm looking at a set of 4 Blizzak tires at a local used >> tire store.These are actually new that I'm considering, I just don't >> know their age. They want $200 for a set of 4, mounted and balanced >> (no warranty that I know of). >> >> First, am I better off with just putting tires on the rear or is >> there >> an advantage to running them on all four corners? >> >> Second, since snow tires are only run a few month out of the year (at >> least here in Indy) I'm guessing they spend a lot of time stacked in >> the garage. I don't drive my van much as it's a 3rd car so snow tires >> won't see a lot of miles (maybe a 1000 or so a year). So is there a >> life expectancy on snows? >> >> BTW, Is there a way to determine how old a tire is? These look good >> but I don't want to buy a set of tires that are so old they'll only >> be >> good for a few seasons. >> >> Mark K >> 1986 GL/2WD/4SPD
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »