

| Subject: | Re: Feast your eyes.... |
| From: | Doug Noganav |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:25:18 -0800 |
I recently called a gal in the Sacramento area who had a nice red full dress 2wd van up for $6700 on craigs list. after watching it for a week it dropped to $3700 so I called the number even though I had zero cash. She said no buyers and needed to sell it to cover house payments. several people said they would buy it at 5 grand or so and never came through with the cash. It was a CHERRY van with low miles and spanking interior and paint. No Porsche alloys or momo wheels but I would prefer not to pay for those anyway. Told here that was a fantastic deal for that van. it had no issues. just a nice cherry vanagon. She said "come and buy it" but I too am not in $$$ position to do it or I certanily would have bought it. Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allan Streib" <streib@CS.INDIANA.EDU> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 11:11 AM Subject: Re: Feast your eyes.... > Well certainly, the market value of any item is what someone is willing > to pay for it. In this case it seems that a decent-looking Carat with a > freshly buffed wax job and armor-all on the rubber and a few aftermarket > accessories is worth $10K. > > I'm just pointing out, it has over 170,000 miles, a waterboxer engine, > wrong tires, and an accident history. I wouldn't pay $10K for that. If > someone else will, more power to the seller. And you're right, it's a > good data point for anyone trying to fight a low-balling insurance > adjuster. > > Allan > > Mark A Kippert <vanagon@KIPPERT.COM> writes: > > > Playing the devil's advocate here. > > > > I have to say I'm confused. Over the last year or so I've read a > > number of threads that relate to how our vans are often undervalued by > > insurance companies, as well as websites like Edmunds and such. We > > often feel our vans are worth much more than they are typically > > rated. Even after they have been wrecked and (properly) rebuilt we > > believe they should still hold their value. > > > > Now it seems odd that most of the posts on this thread feel that this > > van is going for far more than it's worth. Maybe it is, but I would > > think we should be happy as this helps us prove to insurance companies > > and such that they need to think again. > > > > Again...just playing devil's advocate. > > > > Mark K 1986 GL/2WD/4SPD > > -- > 1991 Vanagon GL
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »