

| Subject: | Re: Motor Oil (Synthetic) |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:05:59 -0500 |
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Robert Fisher wrote: > I wouldn't get too wound up about what Click and Clack thought of > anything in any event. > > Cya, > Robert Thanks Robert. My reason for consulting the "Car Talk" web site was to try and locate a link or other means of getting hold of the CR report on oil changes. Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > Behalf Of Dave Mcneely > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:51 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Motor Oil (Synthetic) > > Well, still looking. I did find that any number of sources consider > taxicab service as "severe," due mainly to the low speeds and long > idling times. The "Car Talk" web site has lots of references to the > CR > study, but no link or definitive statement concerning the methods or > results that I could find. Mainly just a bunch of people on their > forum > commenting on it, some of whom remember the results differently from > how > I do. At least one claimed that the results showed a need for > adhering > to factory or more frequent oil change intervals. I do remember that > that was not the case. Oh, I did find that whenever the hosts for the > "Car Talk" show recommend oil change intervals, they still stick with > fairly frequent changes, and do not approve the extended frequency > changes of some manufacturers, despite the results of the CR study. > > Dave > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dave Mcneely wrote: > >> I found a link, but was denied access: >> http://www.xs11.com/stories/croil96.htm >> >> I also found that the report was in 1996. Wow, how time flies. I'll >> look a bit more, but not forever. David >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:53 AM, mcneely4@cox.net wrote: >> >>> Yes, the vehicles used in the study were NYC taxicabs. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Allan Streib wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:27 -0500, "Dave Mcneely" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, for what it's worth, when consumer reports, using modern >>>>> nonsynthetic oils, ran vehicles under severe conditions in New >>>>> York >>>>> City, and extended the oil change interval long beyond the factory >>>>> recommendations, they found no difference in wear compared to >>>>> engines >>>>> that were treated according to factory recommendations. >>>> >>>> Was this the taxicab service test? Remember that NYC taxicabs run >>>> pretty much 24x7, or at least for many hours at a time. That's >>>> actually >>>> better for the motor and oil than a lot of short trips where the >>>> oil >>>> is >>>> cold half the time. >>>> >>>> Allan
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »